• By Kevin E. Noonan —

    USPTO SealThe Patent Trial and Appeal Board has set February 4th at 1:00 pm EST for the Oral Hearing in the Priority Phase of Interference No. 106,115 between the Broad Institute, Harvard University, and MIT (collectively, "Broad") as Senior Party and the University of California/Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC") as Junior Party.  The hearing will be virtual (by telephone, audio only) and will be available to the public upon request under 37 C.F.R. § 41.124(c).  The Parties will each have 20 minutes for argument, and each party will be able to reserve 5 minutes for rebuttal, with the Junior Party, CVC, arguing first.

    The Board's Order, issued January 13th, informs the parties, pursuant to 37 C.F.R. §§ 41.121(b) and 208(b), that:

    Each party bears the burden of presenting persuasive arguments and evidence in the motions it files to establish that it is entitled to relief requested in that motion.  . . .  Thus, the written motions and supporting evidence filed by the parties, as well as the corresponding oppositions, replies, and supporting evidence, constitute the "trial" of an interference proceeding.  To that end, trial testimony of witnesses is presented in the proceeding through written declarations and transcripts of cross-examination depositions submitted with the parties' briefs.  Oral argument in an interference serves as means for the Board to question the parties on issues presented in their briefs and for the parties to summarize their arguments and the supporting evidence.  Neither the oral argument nor demonstrative exhibits used during the oral argument will fulfill the requirement that each party must meet its burden in the briefs previously filed.  Neither the oral argument nor demonstrative exhibits constitute evidence (other than possible admissions).  The demonstratives may not introduce new evidence or argument.  Demonstrative exhibits must cite to the location of the evidence in the record.

    Regarding public access, interested members of the public can request access by e-mailing the request to PTABHearings@uspto.gov.  The parties can object to access if that objection is provided at least five business days prior to the oral hearing date.

  • CalendarFebruary 3, 2022 – "Moving from ST25 to ST26 (The New Sequence Listing Standard)" (Sagacious IP) – 10:00 am (EDT)

    February 8, 2022 – European biotech patent law update (D Young & Co) – 9:00 am, noon, and 5:00 pm (GMT)

    February 16, 2022 – "A Conversation with the Federal Circuit Clerk's Office" (Federal Circuit Bar Association Rules Committee) – 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm (ET)

  • Sagacious IPSagacious IP will be offering a webinar entitled "Moving from ST25 to ST26 (The New Sequence Listing Standard)" on February 3, 2022 at 10:00 am (EDT).  Pooja Chhikara and Devika Saini of Sagacious IP will discuss the following topics:

    • What is Sequence Listing and why is it required?
    • What are the ST25 and ST26 standards?
    • How does ST26 differ from ST25?
    • What are the tools and processes involved in preparing a ST26 Sequence Listing?
    • How can professionals help in preparing an error-free Sequence Listing?

    There is no registration fee for this webinar.  However, those interested in registering for the webinar, should do so here.

  • D Young & CoD Young & Co will be offering its next European biotech patent law update on February 8, 2022.  The webinar will be offered at three times:  9:00 am, noon, and 5:00 pm (GMT).  D Young & Co European Patent Attorneys Simon O'Brien and Tom Pagdin will provide an update of new and important EPO biotechnology patent case law.

    While there is no fee to participate, attendees must register in advance.  Those wishing to register can do so here (9:00 am GMT session), here (noon GMT session), or here (5:00 pm GMT session).

  • Federal Circuit Bar Association_2The Federal Circuit Bar Association (FCBA) Rules Committee will be offering a remote program entitled "A Conversation with the Federal Circuit Clerk's Office" on February 16, 2022 from 2:00 pm to 3:00 pm (ET).  Erik R. Puknys of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP will moderate a panel consisting of Peter Marksteiner, Circuit Executive and Clerk of Court, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and Jarrett Perlow, Chief Deputy Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.  The webinar will provide an introduction to the role of the Clerk's Office, an overview of the Federal Circuit Rules of Practice, and practical advice for complying with the Rules and interacting with the Clerk's Office.

    The webinar is complimentary for FCBA members and students, $50 for government/academic/retired non-members, and $175 for private practitioner non-members.  Those interested in registering for the program, can do so here.

  • By Donald Zuhn —

    Updated First Office Action Estimator Tool Now Available

    USPTO SealIn a Patent Alert email distributed earlier today, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office announced that an updated First Office Action Estimator online tool is now available to Applicants for use in obtaining time estimates for the issuance of first Office actions in applications.  The updated First Office Action Estimator online tool can be accessed here.

    In announcing the availability of the updated tool, the Office noted that the methodology for assigning patent applications to Examiners had changed in FY 2021, and as a result, the First Office Action Estimator tool was updated to account for the new methodology.  The Office also noted that the estimates provided by the First Office Action Estimator are not guaranteed, and that a first Office action estimate will not be available for an application if the application has not yet been classified under the Cooperative Patent Classification (CPC).


    USPTO Extends Modified COVID–19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program

    In a notice published last month in the Federal Register (86 Fed. Reg. 74406), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office announced that it was extending the modified COVID–19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program, and that requests to participate in the pilot program would be accepted until March 31, 2022.  The pilot program, which was implemented in May of 2020, allows applicants that qualify for small or micro entity status to request prioritized examination without paying the fees typically associated with such prioritized examination (see "USPTO Announces COVID-19 Prioritized Examination Pilot Program").

    In addition to the requirement that applicants qualify for small or micro entity status, the claims of a participating application must cover a product or process related to COVID–19, and such product or process must be subject to an applicable FDA approval for COVID–19 use.  Such approvals may include, for example, an Investigational New Drug (IND) application, an Investigational Device Exemption (IDE), a New Drug Application (NDA), a Biologics License Application (BLA), a Premarket Approval (PMA), or an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA).  Other requirements for participating in the pilot program include making the request at the time of filing of a non-continuing original utility or plant nonprovisional application; at the time of filing of an original utility or plant nonprovisional application claiming the benefit of an earlier filing date under 35 U.S.C. §§ 120, 121, or 365(c) of one prior nonprovisional application or one prior international application designating the United States; or at the time of filing or after the filing of a Request for Continued Examination of a plant or utility application or a national stage of an international application.  However, any application that claims the benefit of the filing date of two or more prior filed nonprovisional U.S. applications or international applications designating the United States under 35 U.S.C. §§ 120, 121, or 365(c) is not eligible for participation in the pilot program.  In addition, requests to participate in the pilot program must include an Application Data Sheet, be made via the Office's patent electronic filing systems (EFS-Web or Patent Center), and qualifying applications cannot present more than four independent claims, more than 30 total claims, or any multiple dependent claims.

    In announcing the extension of the pilot program, the Office noted that as November 29, 2021, 180 patents had issued from applications that had been accepted under the pilot program, and the average total pendency, from filing date to issue date, for those applications was 276 days.

    As we reported in our recent "Top Patent Law Stories of 2021" webinar, of the 149 patents that recite "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" in the claims, 89 issued from applications that had been accepted under the pilot program, and the average total pendency for those applications was 280 days.  This compares favorably with the 41 patents that recite "COVID-19" or "SARS-CoV-2" in the claims where examination was accelerated under the Track One Prioritized Examination Program, and where the average total pendency was 259 days.


    USPTO Announces Change in Electronic Retrieval of Priority Documents Between USPTO and EPO

    In a notice published last month in the Official Gazette (1493 OG 877), the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office announced that as of January 1, 2022, electronic retrieval of priority documents between the USPTO and the European Patent Office will be managed via the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Digital Access Service (DAS).  As a result, when claiming priority to a European patent application in a U.S. application filed on or after January 1, 2022, Applicants must submit the country code (i.e., EP), application number, filing date, and WIPO DAS access code associated with the European priority application that is to be retrieved from the EPO by the USPTO via the WIPO DAS.  The notice indicates that the foreign priority information section of the Application Data Sheet (form PTO/AIA/14) includes an access code field for providing the WIPO DAS access code.  For applications that were filed prior to January 1, 2022, Applicants are encouraged to voluntarily provide the WIPO DAS access code for EPO priority applications when submitting an Application Data Sheet for such applications.

    Acknowledgement of WIPO DAS access codes will appear on U.S. application filing receipts.  The Office encourages Applicants to review filing receipts to verify that the Office has acknowledged submission of a WIPO DAS access code.  The Office's notice reminds Applicants that they continue to bear the ultimate responsibility for ensuring that the priority document is filed by the time limit set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.55.

    The Office notes that the certified copy requirement of 35 U.S.C. § 119(b) and 37 C.F.R. § 1.55 is satisfied when a foreign priority document is retrieved electronically via the WIPO DAS during the pendency of the U.S. application.  The Office's notice also indicates that as of June 30, 2023, the USPTO will be unable to retrieve European priority applications without a WIPO DAS access code.

    Further information on priority document exchange via WIPO DAS can be found on the USPTO's Electronic Priority Document Exchange (PDX) Program webpage.

  • By Donald Zuhn —

    HarrityFollowing the release earlier this month of its annual list of the top 300 organizations receiving U.S. utility patents (which Harrity Analytics compiles with the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO)), Harrity Analytics announced the release of its 2022 College, University & Institute Patent 100 earlier today.  Harrity Analytics notes that the 2022 list is a compilation of the top 100 colleges, universities, and other educational institutes based on the number of issued U.S. patents those entities received in 2021.

    Patent Docs readers may recall that we have reported on a similar list of the top 100 worldwide universities receiving U.S. utility patents that has been published annually by the National Academy of Inventors (NAI) and the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO).  Over the past few years, the NAI/IPO list has been released in the summer.  Our report on the 2020 NAI/IPO list can be found here.

    The top 25 universities on the Harrity Analytics listing are as follows (click on table to expand):

    Top 25 2022 Patentees
    The complete list of the top 100 colleges, universities, and other educational institutes can be found here.

    For additional information regarding this and other related topics, please see:

    • "IPO & Harrity Analytics Release List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2021," January 23, 2022
    • "NAI & IPO Release List of Top 100 Universities Receiving Patents in 2020," July 14, 2021
    • "IPO & Harrity Analytics Release List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2020," February 18, 2021
    • "NAI & IPO Release List of Top 100 Universities Receiving Patents in 2019," June 3, 2020
    • "IPO & Harrity Analytics Release List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2019," May 25, 2020
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2018," August 7, 2019
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2017," July 4, 2018
    • "Top 100 Universities Worldwide Granted U.S. Patents in 2016," June 15, 2017
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2016," June 14, 2017
    • "NAI & IPO Release List of Top 100 Universities Receiving Patents in 2014," July 5, 2015
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2014," July 1, 2015
    • "IPO Names Top 100 Patenting Universities," July 24, 2014
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2013," July 7, 2014
    • "NAI & IPO Release List of Top 100 Universities Receiving Patents in 2012," January 7, 2014
    • "Brookings Paper Calls for Technology Transfer Model Based on University Start-ups," December 12, 2013
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2012," June 24, 2013
    • "Another Look at IPO Top 300 and Life Sciences Top 53," June 11, 2012
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2011," June 7, 2012
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2010," June 30, 2011
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2009," May 26, 2010
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2008," May 14, 2009
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders," May 22, 2008
    • "IPO Posts List of Top 300 Patent Holders," April 20, 2007

  • Life Sciences "Top 55"

    By Donald Zuhn —

    IPO #2Earlier this month, the Intellectual Property Owners Association (IPO) and Harrity Analytics announced the release of the 39th annual list of the top 300 organizations receiving U.S. utility patents (see "Top 300 Organizations Granted U.S. Patents in 2021").  Patent Docs readers may recall that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office stopped releasing its annual list of top patent recipients in 2006 in order to "discourag[e] any perception that we believe more is better."

    HarrityAs with the 2020 report, the 2021 report was compiled in collaboration with Harrity Analytics, based on data obtained from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  The IPO and Harrity Analytics noted that patents reported on the 2021 list are utility patents granted during the 2021 calendar year that listed the organization or a subsidiary as the owner on the printed patent document.  Harrity Analytics then used organization and subsidiary data provided to two independent third-party data providers and reviewed over 200,000 assignments to attribute ownership to the correct organizations, where applicable.  The report notes that patents that were granted to two or more organizations jointly are attributed to each organization separately, and that companies for which patents were granted to subsidiaries are combined with patents granted to the parent.

    The IPO and Harrity Analytics also noted that 327,798 patents were issued in 2021, down nearly 7% from the 352,469 patents that issued in 2020.  The top fifteen companies on the Top 300 are listed below (click on table to expand):

    2021 Top 15
    Dell Technologies, General Electric Co., and Alphabet Inc. fell out of the Top 15 in 2021.  Dell Technologies dropped from 12th to 16th, General Electric Co. dropped from 14th to 21st, and Alphabet Inc. dropped from 15th to 17th in 2021.  Jumping into the Top 15 were Qualcomm (17th to 12th), BOE Technology Group (18th to 14th), and Amazon.com, Inc. (16th to 15th).

    As in past years, Patent Docs used the IPO's list of top patent holders to compile a list of the top "life sciences" companies and organizations receiving U.S. utility patents in 2021.  Each organization's top 300 ranking for 2021 is indicated in the "2021 IPO Rank" column; the top 300 ranking for 2020 (if available) is indicated in the "2020 IPO Rank" column; and the change in number of patents from 2020 is indicated in "% Change from 2020."  The Life Sciences Top 55 is listed below (click on table to expand):

    2021 Top 55
    Please note that some of the companies and organizations listed above may be involved in work outside the life sciences sector, and therefore, a portion of the patents granted to these companies and organizations may be directed to other than life sciences-related inventions.  Our list also includes medical device companies.

    For additional information regarding this topic, please see:

    • "IPO & Harrity Analytics Release List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2020," February 18, 2021
    • "IPO & Harrity Analytics Release List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2019," May 20, 2020
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2018," August 7, 2019
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2017," July 4, 2018
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2016," June 14, 2017
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2014," July 1, 2015
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2013," July 7, 2014
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2012," June 24, 2013
    • "Another Look at IPO Top 300 and Life Sciences Top 53," June 11, 2012
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2011," June 7, 2012
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2010," June 30, 2011
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2009," May 26, 2010
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders for 2008," May 14, 2009
    • "IPO Releases List of Top 300 Patent Holders," May 22, 2008
    • "IPO Posts List of Top 300 Patent Holders," April 20, 2007

  • CalendarJanuary 25, 2022 – "User Interfaces — What Can You Patent?" (J A Kemp) – 4:00 pm to 5:00 pm (GMT)

    January 27, 2022 – "Damage Calculations in Intellectual Property Infringement Cases in Canada: The Non-Infringing Alternative in Monetary Remedies in Canadian Patent Law" (OxFirst Limited) – 15:00 to 16:00 (GMT)

    January 27, 2022 – "Patent Activity and Trends in Emerging Markets" (Moeller IP) – 1:00 pm to 1:30 pm (ET)

  • OxFirstOxFirst Limited will be offering a webinar entitled "Damage Calculations in Intellectual Property Infringement Cases in Canada: The Non-Infringing Alternative in Monetary Remedies in Canadian Patent Law" on January 27, 2022 from 15:00 to 16:00 (GMT).  Professor Norman Siebrasse of the University of New Brunswick will address the role of the "non-infringing alternative" in assessing damages and an accounting of profits in Canadian intellectual property cases, and will show how the doctrine is based in traditional principles of "but for" causation, illustrate its application in some of the leading cases, discuss some of the main objections, and discuss some of the fine points that have emerged from Canadian caselaw.

    While there is no cost to participate in the program, those interested in attending the webinar can register here.