
Patent Law Weblog
Category: Post-Grant Proceedings
-
By Andrew Williams — The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office appears to have taken the position that neither party has the burden of persuasion with regard to Motions to Amend after the Aqua Products v. Matal en banc decision (see "Motions to Amend at the PTAB — Does Anyone Have the Burden (And Will That…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan — There has been a great deal of angst generated by the practice before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of expanding panels from the customary three Administrative Patent Judges to include additional APJ's, including the Chief Judge and his deputies. This practice was identified,…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan — The Federal Circuit has granted the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe's motion for stay in inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, in St. Regis Mohawk Tribe v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. In the Order, the Court notes that the PTAB had scheduled final hearing in the IPR for…
-
By George "Trey" Lyons, III — As an endcap to a recent webinar Andrew Williams and I did on the most important PTAB stories from the past year, I addressed the effects that multiple, often serial, petitions can have on patent owners and their patents, and what can be done to alleviate some of the…
-
By Andrew Williams — We recently noted that the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office appears to have taken the position that neither party has the burden of persuasion with regard to Motions to Amend after the Aqua Products v. Matal decision. Certainly, the Patent Owner no longer has the burden, as that is one of…
-
By Andrew Williams — Pharmaceutical patent owners have been one of the more vocal groups decrying the creation and existence of inter partes reviews and other PTAB post-issuance proceedings. And for good reason. Congress enacted the Hatch-Waxman statute to create an abbreviated approval pathway for generic small molecule drugs. In so doing, it crafted a…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan — The St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan filed a joint motion late last week before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB), arguing that its Notice of Appeal divested the Board of jurisdiction over the inter partes review proceedings related to the Tribe's patents obtained…
-
St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan Appeal Denial of Motion to Dismiss on Sovereign Immunity Grounds
By Kevin E. Noonan — Clearly wishing to maintain the momentum and initiative in its inter partes review proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe and Allergan jointly filed a Notice of Appeal to the Federal Circuit yesterday under 35 U.S.C. §…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan – In an extensive, 42-page per curiam opinion, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) surprised no one last Friday by denying the St. Regis Mohawk Tribe's motion to terminate several inter partes review proceedings based on the Tribe's assertion of tribal sovereign immunity. In an effort to avoid undue suspense, the…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan – Although having built up a track record for several years and several thousand petitions and "trials," inter partes review proceedings under the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act are still relatively new. As a statute administered by an administrative agency having the power (and duty) to promulgate rules effecting implementation of that statute,…