Category: Patentable Subject Matter

  • By Michael Borella — Aatrix brought an infringement action against Green Shades in the Middle District of Florida, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,171,615 and 8,984,393.  Green Shades filed a 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on the grounds that all asserted claims were not eligible for patent under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The patents in suit…

  • By Donald Zuhn –- In an interesting decision issued last year, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board reversed the final rejection of claims 1-5 and 9 in U.S. Application No. 12/959,017.  The claims at issue had been rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 101 as reciting patent ineligible subject matter in the form of an abstract…

  • By Michael Borella — This first five or so weeks of 2018 have been busy for Federal Circuit 35 U.S.C. § 101 jurisprudence.  At last count, four substantive decisions have come down so far (including this one, but not including Rule 36 judgments without opinion).  Out of these, two have found the claims at issue to…

  • U.S. Government Fails in Attempt to Invalidate U.S. Patents under § 101 By Joseph Herndon — In a bit of an ironic outcome, the U.S. government was unsuccessful in invalidating U.S. patents under § 101.  It seems odd that the government issued the patents on the one hand, and later, tried to invalidate them. Plaintiff,…

  • By Michael Borella — As patent-eligibility stands in 2018, it can be difficult to determine whether a graphical user interface (GUI) with an innovative layout and/or functionality meets the requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 101.  On one hand, a GUI is almost by definition fundamentally tied to computer operation, and arguably has no non-computer analog.  On…

  • Claims Directed to Television Survive Abstract Idea Challenge By Joseph Herndon — In a recent decision from the U.S. District Court Northern District of California, involving Free Stream Media Corp. v. Alphonso Inc., claims of a television system patent survived a motion to dismiss under 35 U.S.C. § 101. The Plaintiff in this action is…

  • By Michael Borella — Wordlogic brought an action against Fleksy in the Northern District of Illinois, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,681,124 and 8,552,984.  Flesky moved to dismiss the case under Rule 12(b)(6), on the grounds that the asserted claims lacked subject matter eligibility.  Presiding Judge Lefkow of the Northern District denied the motion. Wordlogic…

  • By Michael Borella — The year's first substantive patent-eligibility decision from the Federal Circuit is a rare victory for the patentee.  It is also further evidence that the outcome of an eligibility analysis may be more dependent upon how the analysis is carried out than the actual language of the claims under review. Finjan asserted several…

  • By Donald Zuhn –- After reflecting upon the events of the past twelve months, Patent Docs presents its 11th annual list of top patent stories.  For 2017, we identified nineteen stories that were covered on Patent Docs last year that we believe had (or are likely to have) a significant impact on patent practitioners and…

  • Damned if you do . . . By Kevin E. Noonan – Great cases like hard cases make bad law.  For great cases are called great, not by reason of their importance . . . but because of some accident of immediate overwhelming interest which appeals to the feelings and distorts the judgment. Northern Securities Co.…