Category: Patentable Subject Matter

  • By Brittany Knight* and Anthony Sabatelli** — Software is a generic term to refer to a collection of data or executing code used by a computer to implement arithmetic operations or logical operations.  Back in 1936, Allen Turing, in his landmark paper On Computable Numbers proposed the capable use of instructions (i.e., software) to execute…

  • By Michael Borella — We wrote about this case six months ago, regarding InvestPic's appeal to the Federal Circuit over having its patent invalided under 35 U.S.C. § 101 in the Northern District of Texas.  InvestPic did not get the outcome it was looking for.  Here, the case is back in the District Court to consider…

  • By Michael Borella — Introduction It seems like everyone is talking about artificial intelligence, especially the subset thereof referred to as machine learning.  While some of the discussion is cast in terms of politically-stirred angst about human jobs being replaced by robots or algorithms, a more informed and rational dialog would also set forth machine learning…

  • By Michael Borella — Ancora sued HTC in the Western District of Washington alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 6,411,941.  HTC moved to dismiss the case, contending that the claims of the patent were ineligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  The District Court granted HTC's motion.  Ancora appealed to the Federal Circuit. The '941 patent is…

  • Claims for Determining an Orientation of a 3D Pointing Device Using Sensor Data Found to be Patent-Eligible By James Korenchan — Plaintiff CyWee Group Ltd. ("CyWee") sued Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, "Samsung"), asserting various claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,441,438 (the '438 patent) and U.S. Patent No. 8,552,978…

  • Video Game Patent Found to be Patent Eligible By Joseph Herndon — In the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Plaintiff (Blackbird) sued Defendant (Niantic) alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 9,802,127.  Niantic filed the present motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6), on the basis…

  • By Michael Borella — Data Engine Technologies (DET) filed an infringement suit against Google in the District of Delaware contending infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,590,259, 5,784,545, 6,282,551, and 5,303,146.  Google responded with a Rule 12(c) motion arguing that the patents are directed to patent-ineligible subject matter under 35 U.S.C. § 101.  The District Court agreed…

  • PTAB Affirms Patent Eligibility of Claims for Using Dwell Time to Rank Search Results By James Korenchan — In a decision issued last month, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reversed the final rejection of all pending claims in U.S. Application No. 12/814,020, for which the real party…

  • By Kevin E. Noonan — One of the limitations of our judicial system is that it is inefficient in overcoming error.  This drawback is most pronounced at the Federal Circuit, where precedential decisions can only be overcome by en banc reconsiderations, which (perhaps rightly) occur infrequently (and are not a guarantee that error will be…

  • By Michael Borella — Almost two years ago, we covered a dispute in the Southern District of New York (which began in the Eastern District of Texas) involving plaintiff AlphaCap, a non-practicing entity that aggressively asserted its patents against a number of targets, including Gust.  In short, when Gust didn't quickly settle, AlphaCap offered to dismiss…