Patent Law Weblog
recent posts
- Retired Judges File Amicus Brief in Support of Judge Newman
- Hikma v. Amarin at the Supreme Court: The Parties’ Opening Briefs
- Teva Pharmaceuticals International v. Eli Lilly & Co. (Fed. Cir. 2026)
- USPTO Extends Artificial Intelligence Search Automated Pilot Program (ASAP!)
- USPTO Announces That It Has Turned the Corner on Unexamined Application Backlog
about
Month: March 2020
-
Fitch Even will be offering a webinar entitled "Linking an Invention to the Evidence: Strategic Considerations from Prosecution to Litigation" on March 19, 2020 from 12:00 to 1:00 pm (EDT). Mark A. Borsos and Evan Kline-Wedeen of Fitch Even will discuss the following: • Establishing a nexus between evidence of commercial success of real-world products…
-
By Bryan Helwig — About Life Sciences Court Report: We will periodically report on recently filed biotech and pharma litigation. Pfizer Inc. v. Viwit Pharmaceutical Co.1-20-cv-000160; filed January 31, 2020 in the District Court of Delaware • Plaintiffs: CP Pharmaceuticals International CV, PF Prism CV, Pfizer Inc., amd Pfizer Products Inc.• Defendant: Viwit…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan — Two papers were filed with the PTAB in Interference No. 106,155 between Senior Party The Broad Institute, Harvard University, and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and Junior Party the University of California, Berkeley, the University of Vienna, and Emmanuelle Charpentier (collectively, "CVC"). On February 13, 2020, the parties filed a…
-
By Michael Borella — In 2014's Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int'l case, Justice Thomas famously wrote, "we need not labor to delimit the precise contours of the 'abstract ideas' category in this case." Instead, he found the claims of patentee Alice to have "no meaningful distinction" under 35 U.S.C. § 101 from those the…
Patent Docs 