Strafford #1 Strafford
will be offering a webinar entitled "Obviousness Standard for Patents
Post-KSR: Strategies to Withstand USPTO Obviousness Rejections and
Attacks on Patent Validity" on April 14, 2010 from 1:00 – 2:30 PM (EST).  Ronald Cahill of Nutter McClennen &
Fish, Karen Canaan of CanaanLaw; and Kevin Meek of Baker Botts, will review how
the obviousness standard has been applied by the court and the USPTO since the
Supreme Court's decision in KSR v.
Teleflex
, and outline best practices for patent counsel to avoid
obviousness rejections and defend against attacks on patent validity.  The panel will review the following
questions:


How have the Graham v. John Deere
factors been applied following the KSR
decision?

Under what circumstances has the obvious-to-try standard supported a finding of
obviousness — and when has it worked to nullify such a finding?

What are the steps that patent applicants can take to stand up to obviousness
rejections?

The
registration fee for the webinar is $297 ($362 for registration and CLE
processing). 
Those registering by March 19, 2010 will
receive a $50 discount
. 
Those interested in registering for the webinar, can do so here.

Posted in

One response to “Webinar on Obviousness after KSR”

  1. 6 Avatar

    Free summary of the webinar expanded for free:
    How have the Graham v. John Deere factors been applied following the KSR decision?
    It’s obvious because I say it’s obvious.
    “Under what circumstances has the obvious-to-try standard supported a finding of obviousness — and when has it worked to nullify such a finding?”
    Whenev and Neva.
    “What are the steps that patent applicants can take to stand up to obviousness rejections?”
    Beg.

    Like

Leave a comment