Patent Law Weblog
recent posts
- Apple v. Squires: USPTO Director Has Unlimited Discretion on IPR Institution
- The Ghost in the Machine: Why GenAI Can Be Both a Brilliant Researcher and a Terrible Advocate
- Bayer Files Suit Against Trio of COVID-19 Vaccine Makers
- Allen v. Cooper (4th Cir. 2026)
- To Require an Inventor ID, or Not to Require an Inventor ID – That Is the Question
about
Month: September 2007
-
By Christopher P. Singer — On August 21, 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published new rules concerning continuation and claims practice that will undoubtedly have a profound effect on the way patent attorneys and agents prosecute applications before the Patent Office. In view of the 128-page Federal Register notice regarding the…
-
Tafas v. Dudas, No. 07-CV-846 (E.D. Va.) (filed Aug. 22, 2007) By Robert Dailey — Triantafyllos Tafas has amended his complaint challenging the new USPTO rules set to take effect November 1, 2007. In addition, Tafas has withdrawn his motion for a preliminary injunction (PI) enjoining the PTO from implementing the new rules. …
-
By Donald Zuhn — On August 21, 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published new rules concerning continuation and claims practice that will undoubtedly have a profound effect on the way patent attorneys and agents prosecute applications before the Patent Office. In view of the 128-page Federal Register notice regarding the new…
-
By Christopher P. Singer — On August 21, 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published new rules concerning continuation and claims practice that will undoubtedly have a profound effect on the way patent attorneys and agents prosecute applications before the Patent Office. In view of the 128-page Federal Register notice regarding the…
-
By Sherri Oslick — About Court Report: Each week we will report briefly on recently filed biotech and pharma cases, and a few interesting cases will be selected for periodic monitoring. Sepracor Inc. et al. v. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.3:07-cv-04213; filed September 4, 2007 in the District Court of New Jersey Infringement of…
-
By Kevin E. Noonan — On Friday, the U.S. House of Representatives passed H.R. 1908, a bill intended to "reform" U.S. patent law. Pushed by special interests (mostly in the IT arena) frustrated by the proliferation of patent rights over the past twenty-five years, the bill would fundamentally change U.S. patent law. Whether…
-
September 10, 2007 – New USPTO Rule Packages on Claim Examination and Continuation Applications (American Intellectual Property Law Association) September 12, 2007 – Biotechnology/Chemical/Pharmaceutical Customer Partnership Meeting (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office) September 18, 2007 – Trying a Patent Validity Case in a Post-KSR World (Practising Law Institute) September 18-19, 2007 – Pharma/Biotech Patent Boot…
-
The American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) will be offering a live online seminar entitled: "New USPTO Rule Packages on Claim Examination and Continuation Applications" on September 10, 2007 from 12:30-2:30 PM (EST). Speakers Charles E. Van Horn of Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow,Garrett & Dunner, LLP and Susan P. Pan of Sughrue Mion PLLC will provide…
-
By Donald Zuhn — On August 21, 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published new rules concerning continuation and claims practice that will significantly impact the way patent attorneys and agents prosecute applications before the Patent Office. While patent practitioners – especially those prosecuting applications directed to biotech and pharmaceutical inventions –…
-
By Donald Zuhn — On August 21, 2007, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office published new rules concerning continuation and claims practice that will undoubtedly have a profound effect on the way patent attorneys and agents prosecute applications before the Patent Office. In view of the 128-page Federal Register notice regarding the new…
Patent Docs 